1651 Reasons Christianity is not True

Luke and Acts Luke the Evangelist by Andrea Mantegna When a person puts up a tent, the first stake placed in the ground largely determines the location of the entire tent. Dating the New Testament works in much the same way. Because there are many connections between New Testament books, moving the date of one book tends to drag the dates of a number of other books along with it. Therefore, it is important to decide which book ought to be the first stake, and where on the timeline that stake should be placed. Most modern scholarship identifies the gospel of Mark as the earliest gospel, setting Mark down as the first stake for the tent and working from there. There are good reasons for doing this. However, there is also a problem with using Mark as the first stake, which we discuss in the article on Mark. For now, let us set Mark to the side. I believe that instead of Mark, the first stake should be the book of Acts.

“Ths Historical Jesus”

In a previous article we saw how any such evidence put forward from this Gospel is ambiguous at best and often taken out of context or misinterpreted. If you take away this Gospel, any Biblical foundation for the Trinity, ambiguous or otherwise, comes crashing down. This article is going to show that the Gospel of John is not a reliable historical account of the life and teachings of Jesus: Lack of early evidence.

Dating the Gospel of John is no easy task. The discovery and publication in the s of a papyrus fragment known as P52 changed everything:

The Historical Reliability of the Gospels [Craig L. Blomberg] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. For over twenty years, Craig Blomberg’s The Historical Reliability of the Gospels has provided a useful antidote to many of the toxic effects of skeptical criticism of the Gospels.

Two important functions were connected with this promise: As a result of this, when the Holy Spirit came upon the apostles, those things which they taught and wrote were the commands of the Lord Matthew The New Testament which we read today came into existence through this means. Papyrus 52 52 John Rylands Papyrus 52 Since most of the scholarly world held that the oldest portion of a New Testament manuscript which had survived was a small papyrus fragment of the gospel of John housed in the John Rylands University library in Manchester, England.

This manuscript, known as Papyrus 52 52 , was discovered in Egypt in and dated by C. Roberts to AD. The Magdalen Papyrus In three small fragments of a papyrus of the gospel of Matthew were discovered in Luxor, Egypt and sent to the Magdalen College library in Oxford. Classified as Papyrus 64 64 , these fragments received little attention for over fifty years, until C.

Thiede concluded that based upon comparison with other papyri known to date to the late 1st century and before, an earlier date of AD. This manuscript was published only a few years after its discovery in , by Fredric Kenyon, who dated it to the early 3rd century. Over fifty years later new discoveries and reevaluation of evidence was applied to Papyrus Scholar Young Kyu Kim in a thorough and highly technical paper concluded that Papyrus 46 should be dated to the later 1st century before the reign of Domitian.

The Gospel

In the subject of dating the time of writing of the books of the New Testament, its primary significance is that none of the books of the New Testament give any sign that they were written after this event, and many of the books show evidence that they were written before it. Here, we will briefly review the history of this war, then follow with a survey of some New Testament readings which look to be written prior to it.

The Jews in Jerusalem rebelled and staged a successful attack on the Roman garrison in Jerusalem. The Roman legate of Syria, Cestius Gallus, marched to Jerusalem to attack it, but after initial resistance, his nerve failed him and he ordered a retreat. Roman armor was not designed for fighting a retreating battle in difficult terrain, and Jewish pursuit turned the retreat into a rout, with nearly the entire Roman twelfth legion being destroyed.

This initial failed Roman attempt on Jerusalem may figure into a New Testament passage, and we will return to it later.

By James Bishop| One of the most common objections to Christianity is that Gospels are not reliable or trustworthy sources for Jesus. A variety of reasons are often given for this, including the religious bias of the authors and the decades in between the events and the written accounts of the life of Jesus.

It was found in sand filled ruins of a city vacated about A. This city was vacated in approximately A. Universal testimony says that Codex W was dug up here in The guesses about the date of Codex W were wrong, as Lee W. Woodard demonstrates in his book: They thought they had found a very old manuscript of the four gospels, and indeed they had.

But what they could not grasp was that they had in their hands an original, First Century set of the gospels, marked with round seals by the four evangelists or their scribe and actually dated to the exact year by clever pictorial and alphanumeric dating system. This parchment is known by several names: What blinded them to the facts were two lines of evidence: One, the unusual handwriting.

Even with their considerable paleographic skills, they still estimated the age of the codex writing anywhere from the Second to the Ninth Century.

Who Wrote The Gospel Of John?

December 5, I have been listening to a podcast by York University professor Philip Harland and have been enjoying it. One of the things that he says, that I hear from many scholars, continues to bother me. This has to do with the late dating of the Gospels. Harland dates the Gospel of Matthew to AD. There are a variety of reasons for that.

When I first started investigating the reliability of the New Testament Gospels, I was fascinated by the ancient non-Canonical stories and legends related to they were written too late to be legitimate eyewitness accounts, they were built on the core truths of Gospels (albeit altered and embellished by authors with specific motivations).

This fragment dates to the early third century which puts it in rare company. It contains Romans 9: I had the great pleasure of visiting with Dan Wallace at an event where we got the chance to examine a number of very ancient manuscript fragments. Some of these were Biblical fragments; some of these were non-Biblical ancient documents. We were the first people to examine the documents in nearly two thousand years. By the end of the day it was clear to me that there are literally thousands of fragments of ancient texts still out there to be discovered and examined.

In fact, this is the focus of my book, Cold Case Christianity.

When Was the Book of Revelation Written?

Geisler and Frank Turek. Each coloured link within the article will lead you to a related topic on a different page of this site. However while the text is part of the original article, the links are not. The author of this article may or may not agree with the views expressed on those pages, or necessarily anything else on this site.. Quotations of the Bible From Early Christian Literature The number of such quotations of the Bible known from early Christian literature is vast – over 36, quotes are known from before the Council of Nicaea in A.

“STM takes formation – intellectual, spiritual, pastoral, and personal – very seriously. Such formation is not an end in itself, however. Indeed, the study of theology is ultimately about transformation. We want our graduates to be leaders and agents of transformation in the Church and in the.

Almost no one minds, except for a few groups on the fringes of American Evangelicalism, who seem to think that this makes Christmas itself a pagan festival. Tighe A Mistake The idea that the date was taken from the pagans goes back to two scholars from the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. Dom Jean Hardouin, a Benedictine monk, tried to show that the Catholic Church adopted pagan festivals for Christian purposes without paganizing the gospel.

In the Julian calendar, created in 45 B. There were two temples of the sun in Rome, one of which maintained by the clan into which Aurelian was born or adopted celebrated its dedication festival on August 9th, the other of which celebrated its dedication festival on August 28th. But both of these cults fell into neglect in the second century, when eastern cults of the sun, such as Mithraism, began to win a following in Rome.

And in any case, none of these cults, old or new, had festivals associated with solstices or equinoxes.

How the late polemicist Christopher Hitchens vented seasonal spleen

Blomberg, The Case for Christ 26 Because of the lack of original texts, it has been very difficult to date the canonical gospels as to when they were written or even when they first emerge in the historical record, as these two dates may differ. According to this scholarship, the gospels must have been written after the devastation because they refer to it. However, conservative believers maintain the early dates and assert that the destruction of the temple and Judea mentioned in the gospels constitutes “prophecy,” demonstrating Jesus’s divine powers.

The substantiation for this early, first-century range of dates, both conservative and liberal, is internal only, as there is no external evidence, whether historical or archaeological, for the existence of any gospels at that time. Nevertheless, fundamentalist Christian apologists such as Norman Geisler make misleading assertions such as that “many of the original manuscripts date from within twenty to thirty years of the events in Jesus’ life, that is, from contemporaries and eyewitnesses.

Moreover, even the latest of the accepted gospel dates are not based on evidence from the historical, literary or archaeological record, and over the centuries a more “radical” school of thought has placed the creation or emergence of the canonical gospels as we have them at a much later date, more towards the end of the second century.

A gospel (a contraction of Old English god spel meaning “good news/glad tidings (of the kingdom of God)”, comparable to Greek εὐαγγέλιον, evangelion) is a written account of the career and teachings of Jesus. The term originally meant the Christian message itself, but in the 2nd century it came to be used for the books in which the message was set out.

The reasons for the conclusion that the Gospel of John was written after the letters of Paul, the Synoptic gospels Matthew, Mark, and Luke , and many of the later letters, is based on a variety of evidences that when considered collectively suggest a post AD composition. Perhaps the most basic assumption regarding the date of composition of the Gospel of John is its theology in comparison to the other three gospels.

Specifically, the fourth gospel emphasizes the divinity of Jesus and his premortal role as deity John 1: Jesus also declares that he is God in the Gospel of John John 8: Other stories present a very exalted portrait of Jesus in comparison to the Gospel of Mark, for example, where Jesus appears to be angry Mark 3: If theology and belief in Jesus developed from a more primitive understanding to a more exalted belief in Jesus as scholars suggest, then the Gospel of John is the end product of that development whereas the Gospel of Mark is the beginning.

An example of this occurrence may be found in the account of the Mount of Transfiguration, which the Gospel of John omits, by chance because the story was already recorded in three earlier sources. Another important consideration is that the Gospel of John may be trying to counteract certain break-off Christian groups, sometimes designated as Docetists, because of their belief that Jesus was not actually mortal, but instead, they advocate, Jesus only appeared to our eyes to be mortal.

John may have attempted to undermine these claims by including stories of Jesus eating fish John

Freethought Nation Forums

This dramatic event, counted as Seleucus’ first regal year, was continued as the Seleucid Era, the first continuous count of time in world chronology, soon to inspire the similar Arsacid Era of Parthia. There is also the residual uncertainty about Hellenistic dating. Bickerman, for instance, positively asserted that Seleucus reconquered Babylon “in August of ” [Chronology of the Ancient World, Cornell University Press, , , , p.

Seleucus] was given a thousand men by Ptolemy and set out from Palestine to Babylonia” [Dividing the Spoils, Oxford, , p.

The Restoration of Priesthood Keys on Easter Part 1: Dating the First Easter. by John P. Pratt. Reprinted from The Ensign 15, No. 6 (June, ), pp. © by Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

In the fourth century, Church historian Eusebius quoted early Church father and bishop Papias of Hierapolis c. This, too, the presbyter used to say. For he had not heard the Lord or been one of His followers, but later, as I said, one of Peter’s. Peter used to adapt his teachings to the occasion, without making a systematic arrangement of the Lord’s sayings, so that Mark was quite justified in writing down some things just as he remembered them.

For he had one purpose only—to leave out nothing that he had heard, and to make no misstatement about it. Papias” says,"Of Papias’s life nothing is known. According to Eusebius—in disagreement with Irenaeus, who suggested Papias had known the apostle John—Papias had no direct acquaintance with any of the apostles: Papias himself remarked that he received his knowledge second-hand, even about the apostle John, when he stated: And whenever anyone came who had been a follower of the presbyters, I inquired into the words of the presbyters, what Andrew or Peter had said, or Philip or Thomas or James or John or Matthew, or any other disciple of the Lord, were still saying.

Indeed, Papias is merely passing along what he had heard from the disciples’"former pupils. If these individuals Papias is relying on were not even Christ’s followers at that time, why should we trust their statements?

The Lost Sayings Gospel Q

Joyful carols, special liturgies, brightly wrapped gifts, festive foods—these all characterize the feast today, at least in the northern hemisphere. But just how did the Christmas festival originate? The Bible offers few clues: Yet most scholars would urge caution about extracting such a precise but incidental detail from a narrative whose focus is theological rather than calendrical.

The extrabiblical evidence from the first and second century is equally spare:

Printed from Dates and Authorship of the Gospels. In French. It’s a most basic set of questions to ask: Who wrote the Gospels?

View 3 Items DepositPhotos A prominent Los Angeles homicide detective with theological training lays out a case for the early composition of the New Testament gospels. Warner Wallace brings his unique background as a widely respected murder investigator with a graduate theological degree to bear on the reliability of the New Testament. Among the many topics that he addresses is the date of composition of the four New Testament gospels.

Wallace defends their early origin, arguing that they represent genuine eyewitness testimony. The list and discussion below summarizes pages of his thoroughly enjoyable book, necessarily omitting much of its detail and all of his responses to counterarguments: Coming at the conclusion of the First Jewish Revolt against Rome, that catastrophe fundamentally changed the nature of Judaism and, arguably, of Christianity.

Are the Gospels Anonymous?

When were the Gospels written? Subscribe to our Question of the Week: It is important to understand that the dating of the Gospels and other New Testament books is at best an educated guess and at worst foolish speculation.

What are the most accurate dates for the canonical gospels in the New Testament as we have them? Are these texts really the faithful accounts of eyewitnesses written shortly after Jesus’s advent? Or does the evidence point to the gospels as anonymous compositions dating to the late second century?

His Christian evaluation of this text demonstrates that it is a later work written in the fourth century after Christ and inconsistent with the original first century writings. Some of the ideas presented in this document were rejected by the early church of the first century. Anyone who has visited the Wikipedia web site, the online encyclopedia with almost two million entries, knows that while the information is usually presented in a scholarly style, it can be a bit slanted at times.

The two Wikipedia sources most mentioned in support of this position are Elaine Pagels, professor of religion at Princeton, and the group of scholars known as the Jesus Seminar. Both are known for their distaste for evangelical theology and traditional views on the canon in general. What I found more interesting, though, is the background discussion on the article. Wikipedia includes a running dialogue of the debates that determine what actually gets posted into the article, as well as what gets removed, and here the discussion can be a bit more emotional.

Later Dating of the Gospels, Bible Geek [AUDIO]